A Couple of Discoveries

While archaeology does go slow and it can take time to get new information. However, discoveries are made all the time and here are two more. #1. 8,000-year-old encampment — with tridents and war paint materials — found in England While excavating a floodplain in England, archaeologists stumbled upon an ancient site where hunter-gatherers onceContinue reading “A Couple of Discoveries”

The Bible & Modern Archaeology

We came across this article the other day, An Archaeological Dig Reignites the Debate Over the Old Testament’s Historical Accuracy, and it is a prime example of how modern archaeologists use strawman arguments or other logical fallacies to claim the Bible is wrong. We have searched for clues in the Bible but one passage ofContinue reading “The Bible & Modern Archaeology”

If You Do Not Have Verifiable Evidence

Then do not say anything or make any claims. This is a topic that undermines the credibility of both anthropology and archaeology. Anthropologists and archaeologists, among other scientists, continue to make extraordinary claims without verifiable evidence to back those claims up. Before we get to the article in question we need to make a distinctionContinue reading “If You Do Not Have Verifiable Evidence”

Jerusalem’s Destruction Supported

One of the drawbacks to archaeology is that very little happens in real-time. It can take years to hear about discoveries made by archaeologists that support the Bible or other ancient events. Sometimes, the archaeologists’ final report is made decades after the archaeologist has finished excavating a site. This was the case with the MeyersContinue reading “Jerusalem’s Destruction Supported”

Archaeological Controversies

It seems that this research field is not without its issues. This is due partially, or even a majority of the time, to differing opinions on different discoveries. However, it is not always different opinions that create these controversies but the decisions some archaeologists make. For example, the upcoming link has one example of thisContinue reading “Archaeological Controversies”

A Bad Philosophy

This has to do with archaeological thinking and how archaeologists conduct their excavations. It is a pet peeve for us and we may have written about this previously, yet it deserves another post. The article that ‘triggered’ opur pet peeve is: Why Do Archaeologists Rebury Their Excavations? The practice helps preserve the site for futureContinue reading “A Bad Philosophy”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started